A Truro Police officer, identified by the name tag as Cst. B. Bowden, stands facing the camera in full ceremonial blue uniform adorned with medals and a shoulder cord. He wears a formal cap and glasses. In the background, several RCMP officers in red serge uniforms and attendees in suits and dresses are gathered outdoors under trees, suggesting a formal or commemorative event.
Truro Police Constable, Brent Bowden, says that a year ago on June 24, 2024, D/Sgt Robert John Hunka, in the presence of Cst. Ed Cormier, threw a banana peel on his personal vehicle in an act of anti-Black racism.

Black officer’s case will proceed after police union refused help in discrimination complaint involving fellow officers

Brent Bowden, a Black police officer in Truro, filed a complaint because he believes his union (the Atlantic Police Association) didn’t fairly represent him after a racist incident at work — someone left a banana peel on his car, a known racial stereotype and insult against Black people.

Key Details:

1) The Racist Incident (June 24, 2024)

  • Someone put a banana peel on Bowden’s car windshield.

  • His co-workers tried to say it was a joke related to health and safety.

  • As a Black man, Bowden found the act deeply offensive and racist.

     

2) He Went to His Union (October–November 2024)

  • He asked for help from the union to file a formal complaint or take action.

  • The union refused to help, saying they couldn’t represent him because the people he was accusing were also union members.

  • Bowden replied, asking for any representative — not just the one with a conflict.

  • Again, the union declined, saying they could help him “resolve it” but would not support him in pursuing accountability.

 

What Did Bowden Do Next?

December 4, 2024: Bowden filed a complaint with the Nova Scotia Labour Board under the Trade Union Act, claiming the union failed in its Duty of Fair Representation (DFR).

What is a DFR Complaint?

This type of complaint means you’re saying your union acted:

  • Arbitrarily (randomly, unfairly),

  • Discriminatorily, or

  • In bad faith (dishonestly or with a conflict of interest) … when it was supposed to represent you as a union member.

     

What Did the Labour Board Say So Far?

The Board said YES — Bowden’s complaint is:

  • Valid: The banana incident could reasonably be tied to racism.

  • Timely: He filed within 90 days of being denied support.

  • In-Scope: Even though it’s not about wages or schedules, every worker has a legal right to be protected from racism at work — and that’s part of what unions are supposed to help enforce.

Next step: A Review Officer will now look deeper into the case.

What the Union Argued

The union said:

  • They can’t help Bowden because he’s accusing other members.

  • He didn’t file a grievance formally first.

  • This isn’t a “collective agreement” issue (like pay or hours).

     

The Board disagreed, saying:

  • Anti-Black racism is a human rights issue, which falls under labour law too.

  • Bowden did try to resolve things internally — the union just shut him down.

     

Why This Matters — Especially for Black Nova Scotians

  • Unions have power — if they refuse to help a Black member stand up against racism, that’s a serious problem.

  • This case confirms that racism at work is not just a human rights issue — it’s also a union issue.

  • If this moves forward, it could set a precedent that says: unions can’t look the other way when racism happens among their members.

     

What Can Others Learn or Do?

For Black Workers:

  • Know that you have rights — not just from your boss, but from your union too.

  • If you’re denied support, document it and push for fair treatment.

  • This case shows that racism disguised as a “joke” or “misunderstanding” can still be taken seriously by the law.

 

For Unions:

  • You can’t ignore racism, even if the person accused is a member.

  • You have a duty to protect every member, including when there are internal disputes rooted in discrimination.

 

What Happens Next

  1. Referral to a Review Officer The Board will now assign a Review Officer (under Section 56A of the Trade Union Act) to:

    • Review the facts more deeply,

    • Attempt informal resolution (mediation or settlement) if possible.


  2. If No Resolution is Reached → Full Hearing

    • A Labour Board hearing will be scheduled.

    • Bowden and the union will present evidence and testimony.

    • Legal arguments will be made on whether the APA violated its duty of fair representation (DFR).

       

  3. Decision by the Labour Board

    • The Board could rule that:

      • The APA failed Bowden and must take action, possibly including formal representation, an apology, or even compensation.

      • Or, that the APA’s actions were legally acceptable (if the Board is convinced they weren’t arbitrary, discriminatory, or in bad faith — but that’s now an uphill argument for APA).

         

  4. Possible Appeal

    • Either party can appeal the decision to the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, but appeals must show an error of law, not just disagreement.

       

    BlackNovaScotia.ca

WATCH: